Positioning in pelvic robotic surgery and its repercussions on patient safety
Posicionamento em cirurgia robótica pélvica e suas repercussões na segurança do paciente
Palavras-chave:
Robotic Surgical Procedures, Patient Positioning, Systematic ReviewResumo
Objectives: To describe the positions used in robotic pelvic surgery, observe the impact of these positions on patient safety and evaluate precautions for the patient's surgical positioning during the intraoperative period. Methods: A Systematic Literature Review (RSL) was carried out over the last 5 years. Results: 184 articles were located, of which 13 were selected according to PRISMA recommendations. Result: It was found that the main type of positioning used in robotic surgeries of the pelvic region is the trendelenburg associated with the lithotomy position, in addition to the pneumopritoneus. The main complications are: bradycardia, thromboembolisms, increased ocular, intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressure, neuropraxia, compartment syndrome, increased ICP, facial edema, injuries to pressure points. Prevention measures include the use of special anti-skid padding and mattresses, buttock padding, adequate positioning of the limbs. The use of fastening straps is recommended to avoid the risk of slips and falls and repositioning to the supine position for 10 minutes every 3 hours.
Downloads
Referências
BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. A.; · MACEDO, M. O Método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, v. 5, n. 11, p. 121-136, 2011.
BRANDÃO, J. C. et al. Global and regional respiratory mechanics during robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: A randomized study. Anesthesia and Analgesia, v. 129, n. 6, p. 1564-1573, 2019.
CAMMAROTA, G. et al. Esophageal pressure versus gas exchange to set PEEP during intraoperative ventilation. Respiratory Care, v. 65, n. 5, p. 625-635, 2020.
CHEN, K. et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position on cerebral hemodynamics during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A randomized controlled study: A randomized controlled study. Medicine, v. 98, n. 21, p. e15794, 2019.
JOHANSSON, V. R.; VON VOGELSANG, A.-C. Patient‐reported extremity symptoms after robot‐assisted laparoscopic cystectomy. Journal of Clinical Nursing, v. 28, n. 9–10, p. 1708-1718, 2019.
KIM, N. Y. et al. Prediction of hypotension after postural change in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using esophageal Doppler monitoring: a prospective observational trial. Scientific Reports, v. 11, n. 1, p. 14589, 2021.
KIRMAYR, M. et al. The GRADE approach, Part 1: how to assess the certainty of the evidence. Medwave, v. 21, n. 2, p. e8109–e8109, 2021.
LOPES, C. M. M.; GALVÃO, C. M. Posicionamento cirúrgico: evidências para o cuidado de enfermagem. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, v. 18, n. 2, 8 telas, 2010.
MATSUO, K. et al. Risk of upper-body adverse events in robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, v. 28, n. 9, p. 1585- 1594.e1, 2021.
MATSUOKA, T. et al. Changes of cerebral regional oxygen saturation during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position under propofol anesthesia: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiology, v. 19, n. 1, p. 72, 2019.
MOHER, D.; LIBERATI, A.; TETZLAFF, J.; ALTMAN, D. G.; THE PRISMA GROUP. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, v. 6, n. 7, e1000097, 2009.
OUZZANI, M. et al. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, v. 5, n. 210, p. 1-10, 2016.
PAGE, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, v. 372, n. 31, p. 1-9, 2021.
PIEPER, D.; PULJAK, L. Language Restrictions in systematic reviews should not be imposed in the search strategy but in the eligibility criteria necessary. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 132, p. 146-147, 2021.
RETHLEFSEN, M. L. et al. PRISMA-S: anextensiontothe PRISMA Statement for ReportingLiteratureSearches in Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, v. 10, n. 39, p. 1-19, 2021.
SOUSA L. M. M.; SEVERINO, S. S. P.; ANTUNES, A. V. A Metodologia de revisão integrativa de literatura em enfermagem. Integração em Enfermagem, p. 17-26, 2017.
SPRUCE, L.; VAN WICKLIN, S. A. Back to basics: positioning the patient. AORN Journal, v. 100, n. 3, p. 298–305, 2014.
STECK-BAYAT, K. P. et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing cephalad migration in robotic gynecologic surgery using egg-crate foam versus the Pink Pad®. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 14, n. 2, p. 343–347, 2020.
STEFAN, S. S.; AHMAD, Y.; KHAN, J. S. Ergonomics in robotic surgery: patients’ safety and protection during complex procedures. Mini-Invasive Surgery, v. 5, n. 23, 2021.
TSUCHIYA, Y. et al. Creatine kinase elevation after robotic surgery for rectal cancer due to a prolonged lithotomy position. BMC Surgery, v. 20, n. 1, p. 136, 2020.
WATSON, M. J. et al. Decreasing the prospect of upper extremity neuropraxia during robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a novel technique. Journal of Robotic Surgery, v. 14, n. 5, p. 733–738, 2020.
WEISER, T. G. et al. Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet, v. 385, Suppl 2, p. S11, 2015.
WIESINGER, C. et al. Cerebral oxygenation in 45-degree trendelenburg position for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-center, open, controlled pilot study. BMC Urology, v. 20, n. 1, p. 198, 2020.
