Hybrid architecture to support the intelligent mapping and redesign of organizational processes
Arquitetura híbrida para apoiar o mapeamento inteligente e o redesenho de processos organizacionais
Palavras-chave:
Intelligent Process Mapping and Redesign, Process Mining, Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF, BPMResumo
The objective of this article was to develop and apply a Hybrid Architecture (HA) based on Business Process Management (BPM), Enterprise Architecture (EA) with TOGAF and Process Mining (PM) to support the intelligent mapping and redesign of organizational processes. The experiments were carried out in four phases: company selection, data selection, computational experiments and comparison of results. The comparison of the results showed that with the application of AH the mapping time was reduced by 60%, the number of people involved by 50% and a 20% reduction in the return time to the customer. The number of activities mapped with AH increased from 19 to 27, that is, 42% more than in the traditional method. It was concluded that AH contributed intelligence, agility and discovery of knowledge not perceptible with other methods to support intelligent mapping and redesign of organizational processes.
Downloads
Referências
Aalst, W.M.P., Carmona, J. (2022). Scaling Process Mining to Turn Insights into Actions. Process Mining Handbook. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 448, 181-196. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08848-3_17.
ABPMP Association of Business Process Management Professionals International. (2020). Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK) Business Process Management (BPM). Versão 4.0.
Ansyori, R., Qodarshi, N., Soewito, B. (2018). A systematic literature review: Critical Success Factors to Implement Enterprise Architecture. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 43-51. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.148.
Araghi, S.N., Fontanili, F., Lamine, E., Okongwu, U., Benaben, F. (2022). Stable heuristic miner: Applying statistical stability to discover the common patient pathways from location event logs. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 14, 200071. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200071.
Ayecha, H.B., Ghannouchi, S.A., Amor, E.A.H. (2021). Extension of the BPM lifecycle to promote the maintainability of BPMN models. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 852-860. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.239.
Barafort, B., Mesquida, A., Mesquida, L., Mas, A. (2018). Integrated risk management process assessment model for IT organizations based on ISO 31000 in an ISO multi-standards. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 60, 57-66. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.010.
Chamorro, A.E.M., Resinas, M., Cortés, A.R. (2018). Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Services, 11, 54464017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2017.2772256.
Ganesha, D., Venkatamuni, Vijayakumar, M. (2017). Design and Development of Hybrid Architecture Model Named Enhanced Mind Cognitive Architecture of pupils for Implementing the Learning Concepts in Society of Agents. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 10(1), 1-9. Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i1/109390.
Gartner. (2021). Enterprise Architecture and Digital Transformation. Disponível em: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/enterprise-architects-define-digital-platforms.
Goldschmidt, R., Passos, E. (2005). Data Mining um guia prático. Conceitos, Técnicas, Ferramentas, Orientações e Aplicações. Ed. Campus, ISBN-13: 978-8535218770, Rio de Janeiro.
Jones, D., Hutcheson, S., Camba, J.D. (2021). Past, present, and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, 936-948. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.006.
Kornyshova, E., Barrios, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 Impact Propagation on Enterprise Architecture Models. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 2497–2506. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.326.
Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology: A Step-By-Step Guide. Austrália, ISBN-10: 1526449897, ISBN-13: 978-1526449894.
Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., Mao, J. (2018). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal, 28, 1129–1157. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12153.
Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., Quagli, R. (2020). Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 642-656. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033.
Meidan, A., Garcia-Garcia, J., Alberto, E., Ramos, M.J.I. (2017). A survey on business processes management suites. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 51, 71-86. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.06.003.
Nurmadew, D., Mahendrawathi, E. (2019). Analyzing Linkage Between Business Process Management (BPM) Capability and Information Technology: A Case Study in Garment SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 935-942. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.202.
Santhosh, R., Mohanapriya, M. (2020). Generalized fuzzy logic-based performance prediction in data mining. In Materials Today Proceedings, 45, 1770-1774. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.626.
Satyal, S., Weber, I., Paik, H., Ciccio, C., Mending, J. (2019). Business process improvement with the AB-BPM methodology. Information Systems, 84, 283-298. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2018.06.007.
Schmiedel, T., Recker, J., Brocke, J.V. (2020). The relation between BPM culture, BPM methods, and process performance: Evidence from quantitative field studies. Information & Management Journal, 57, ID 103175. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103175.
Schulte, S., Janiesch, C., Weber, I., Hoenischa, P. (2015). Elastic Business Process Management: State of the art and open challenges for BPM in the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 46, 36-50. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.5715.
Togaf The Open Group Framework. (2018). Versão 9.2, um padrão do The Open Group. Disponível em: https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/.
Vahid, J.S., Perez, A.G., Candelo, E., Couturier, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 100-111. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.020.
Verhoef, P.C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J.Q., Fabian, N., Haenlein, M. (2019). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.
Zachman, J.A. (1987). A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276-292. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276.
Zhang, M., Chen, H., Luo, A. (2018). A Systematic Review of Business-IT Alignment Research with Enterprise Architecture. IEEE Journals & Magazines, 6, 18933-18944. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2819185.
Zhou, Z., Zhi, Q., Morisaki, S., Yamamoto, S. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review on Enterprise Architecture Visualization Methodologies. IEEE Access Journal, 8, 96404-96427. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995850.