Robotic surgery for the patient undergoing resection of a rectal tumor: a systematic review

A cirurgia robótica para o paciente submetido a ressecção de tumor de reto: uma revisão sistemática

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Robotic Surgical Procedures, Colorectal Surgery, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Systematic Review

Resumo

Objective: To analyze the results of different surgical modalities for patients undergoing rectal tumor resection. Methods: A systematic literature review of texts published in databases in the last 10 years was carried out. Results: 84 results were found and 29 studies made up the corpus: 11 exclusively evaluated robotic surgery (Group I), 12 compared robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery (Group II); four compared robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and open surgery (Group III); two address robotic surgery, but deal with rectal tumor resection procedures in conjunction with the resection of liver metastases (Group IV). Conclusion: 24 studies (82.8%) evaluated robotic surgery as the most favorable for the treatment of rectal cancer, three studies (10.3%) considered robotic surgery equivalent to laparoscopic and two studies (6.9%) judged laparoscopic superior to robotic surgery. Among the differentials of robotic surgery for patients undergoing the procedure, the following stand out: mortality rates below other types of surgery, significant reduction in surgical trauma, lower rate of urinary retention and loss of sphincter control.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Luciane de Souza Velasque, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Graduação em Estatística pela Universidade do Estado do Rio do Janeiro-UERJ (2001), Mestrado em Saúde Coletiva pelo Instituto de Medicina Social-UERJ (2003) e Doutorado em Saúde Pública pela Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública-FIOCRUZ (2011). É Professora Associada da Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio do Janeiro-UNIRIO, aonde desde 2015 a Educação Estatística passou ser uma área de atuação e pesquisa. Preocupada com o Ensino de Estatística na Educação Básica contribuiu com a análise da BNCC e passou atuar como membro permanente no PROFMAT-UNIRIO e PEMAT-UFRJ, onde vem orientando dissertações e teses na área de Ensino de Estatística com metodologias ativas e uso de tecnologia. Desde 2020, foi cedida pela UNIRIO para atuar na Secretaria de Estado de Saúde (SES RJ), trabalhando com análise de dados no enfrentamento da Pandemia da COVID-19. Atualmente é Superintendente de Informação Estratégica de Vigilância em Saúde na SES, atuando com as Emergências de Saúde Pública.

Referências

AHMED, J.; NASIR, M.; FLASHMAN, K.; KHAN, J.; PARVAIZ, A. Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases. International Journal of Colorectal Diseases, v. 31, n. 4, p. 869-876, 2016.

ALIMOGLU, O.; ATAK, I.; KILIC, A.; CALISKAN, M. Robot-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, v. 8, n. 3, p. 371-374, 2012.

ASKLID, D. et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study. Colorectal Diseases, v. 21, n. 2, p. 191-199, 2019.

BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. A.; MACEDO, M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, v. 5, n. 11, p. 121-136, 2011.

BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes metodológicas: Sistema GRADE – Manual de graduação da qualidade da evidência e força de recomendação para tomada de decisão em saúde. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2014.

CHO, M. S. et al. Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore), v. 94, n. 11, e522, 2015.

DOUISSARD, J. et al. Totally robotic vs hybrid abdominoperineal resection: A retrospective multicenter análisis. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, v. 16, n. 2, e2073, 2020.

FERNANDES, P. M. P.; MARIANI, A. W. Cirurgia minimamente invasiva: um conceito já incorporado. Revista Diagnóstico e Tratamento, v. 19, n. 2, p. 57-58, 2014.

FERREIRA, F. B. S. et al. Resposta patológica completa ao tratamento neoadjuvante como fator prognóstico para pacientes com câncer de reto. Clinical Oncology Letters, v. 1, n. 19, p. 9-13, 2015.

HARA, M. et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, v. 57, n. 5, p. 570-577, 2014.

HOSPITAL ISRAELITA ALBERT EINSTEIN. Brasil comemora 10 anos de cirurgia robótica. São Paulo: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.einstein.br/sobre-einstein/imprensa/press-release/brasil-comemora-10-anos-de-cirurgia-roboticahttps://www.einstein.br/sobre-einstein/imprensa/press-release/brasil-comemora-10-anos-de-cirurgia-robotica. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2022.

HUANG, C. W. et al. Robotic surgery with high dissection and low ligation technique for consecutive patients with rectal cancer following preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy. International Journal of Colorectal Diseases, v. 31, n. 6, p. 1169-1177, 2016.

HYDE, L. Z. et al. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Diseases, v. 21, n. 8, p. 932-942, 2019.

INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER (INCA). Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2019.

KATSUNO, H. et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Surgery Today, v. 50, n. 3, p. 240-247, 2020.

KETHMAN, W. C. et al. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63(1): 46-52.

LAW, W. L.; FOO, D. C. C. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 31, n. 7, p. 2798-2807, 2017.

LEVIC, K.; DONATSKY, A. M.; BULUT, O.; ROSENBERG, J. A Comparative Study of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer. Surgical Innovation, v. 22, n. 4, p. 368-375, 2015.

MOHER, D.; LIBERATI, A.; TETZLAFF, J.; ALTMAN, D. G.; THE PRISMA GROUP. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, v. 6, n. 7, e1000097, 2009.

PARISI, A. et al. Robotic rectal resection for cancer: a prospective cohort study to analyze surgical, clinical and oncological outcomes. International Journal of Surgery, v. 12, n. 12, p. 1456-1461, 2014.

PARK, I. J. et al. Reverse-hybrid robotic mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, v. 55, n. 2, p. 228-233, 2012.

SANTOS, C. M. C.; PIMENTA, C. A. M.; NOBRE, M. R. C. A Estratégia pico para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, v. 15, n. 3, p. 508-511, 2007.

UNIVERSITY OF YORK. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews – PROSPERO. York, UK: Center for Reviews and Dissemination, 2017.

YANG, S. X. et al. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, v. 17, 2018.

YE, J. et al. Robotic-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: technique and results from a single institution. Techniques in Coloproctology, v. 25, n. 6, p. 693-700, 2021.

ZAGHLOUL, A. S.; MAHMOUD, A. M. Preliminary results of robotic colorectal surgery at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. Journal of Egyptian National Cancer Institute, v. 28, n. 3, p. 169-174, 2016.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-01-30

Edição

2024: Frontiers of Knowledge

Seção

Articles