Accuracy of two electronic apex locators: in vivo and in vitro study

Precisão de dois localizadores apicais eletrônicos: estudo in vivo e in vitro

Autores

  • Leonardo Pereira Garcia Universidade de Fortaleza
  • Fabio Gomes UNIFOR
  • Fernanda Geraldo Pappen Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Eduardo Diogo Gurgel Filho Universidade de Fortaleza
  • Natalia de Santiago Universidade de Fortaleza
  • Luiz Carlos Trevia Morais Correia Viana Universidade de Fortaleza
  • Claudio Maniglia-Ferreira

Palavras-chave:

Root canal therapy, Endodontic, Odontometry

Resumo

The present study proposed the comparison of the reading between the in vivo and in vitro models during the evaluation of Root ZX II foramen locators and Propex II. The localization of the major foramen was determined electronically in 40 canals of human single-rooted teeth in the in vivoand in vitro models. After the two measurements, the actual tooth length was measured. All values were tabulated and submitted to the statistical analysis of the data, applying the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test with significance level of 5% (p<0,05). Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the in vivo and in vitro models regarding the accuracy of the Root ZX II and Propex II devices during the localization of the major foramen. In the in vivo model, Propex II presented accuracy of 75% (±0,5mm) and 90% (±1,0mm) and Root ZX II presented accuracy of 80% (±0,5mm) and 92,5% (±1,0mm). For the in vitro model, Propex II presented accuracy of 72,5% (±0,5mm) and 97,5% (±1,0mm) and Root ZX II presented accuracy of 80% (±0,5mm) and 95% (±1,0mm). There were no statistically significant differences between the in vivo and in vitro models and between the devices used in the research.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Aggarwal V, Singla M, Bhasin SS. Influence of instrument size and varying electrical resistance of root canal instruments on accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J 2017; 50 (5), 506-11.

Aguiar BA, Reinaldo RS, Frota LMA, et al. Root ZX electronic foramen locator: an ex vivo study of its three model’s precision and reproducibility. Int J Dent 2017: Article ID 5893790, 4 pages. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5893790.

Briseño-Marroquín B, Frajlich S, Goldgerg F, et al. Influence of instrument size on the accuracy of different apex locators: an in vitro study. J Endod 2008; 34 (6), 698-702.

Cianconi L, Angotti V, Felici R, et al. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators compared with digital radiography: an ex vivo study. J Endod 2010; 36(12), 2003-7.

Cimilli H, Aydemir S, Kartal N, et al. Comparing the accuracy of four electronic apex locators for determining the minor diameter: an ex vivo study. J Dent Sci 2013; 8(1), 27-30.

Duran-Sindreu F, Stöber E, Mercadé M, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro readings when testing the accuracy of the Root ZX apex locator. J Endod 2012; 38(2), 236-9.

Ebrahim AK, Wadachi R, Suda H. An in vitro evaluation of accuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals. Aust Dent J 2007; 52 (3), 193-7.

Gehlot PM, Manjunath V, Manjunath MK. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of four electronic apex locators using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium hands files. Restor Dent Endod 2016, 41(1), 6-11.

Goldberg F, Frajlich S, Kuttler S, et al. The evaluation of four electronic apex locators in teeth with simulated horizontal oblique root fractures. J Endod 2008; 34 (12), 1497–9.

Goldberg F, Marroquín BB, Frajlich S, et al. In vitro evaluation of the ability of three apex locators to determine the working length during retreatment. J Endod 2005; 31(9), 676-8.

Goldberg F, Silvio AC, Manfré S, et al. In vitro measurement accuracy of an electronic apex locator in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. J Endod 2002; 28 (6), 461-3.

Herrera M, Ábalos C, Lucena C, et al. Critical diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study. J Endod 2011; 37(9), 1306-9.

Kim YJA; Chandler NP. Determination of working length for teeth with wide or immature apices: a review. Int Endod J 2013; 46(6), 483-91.

Kobayashi C, Suda H. New electronic canal measuring device based on the ratio method. J Endod 1994; 20(3), 111-4.

Lipski M, Trabska-SwistelnickaM, Wozniak K, et al. Evaluation of alginate as a substitute for root-surrounding tissues in electronic root canal measurements. Aust Endod J 2013; 39(3), 155-8.

Mancini M, Felici R, Conte G, et al. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: an ex vivo study. J Endod 2011; 37(5), 684-7.

Meares WA, Steiman HR. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator. J Endod 2002; 28 (8), 595-8.

Milanovic I, Ivanovic V, Vujaskovic M, et al. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in determining the apical foramen in multi-rooted teeth: randomised clinical and laboratory study. Aust Endod J 2015; 41(1), 35-43.

Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, et al. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J 2006; 39(8), 595-606.

Parente LA, Levin MD, Vivan RR, et al. Efficacy of electronic foramen locators in controlling root canal working length during rotary instrumentation. Braz Dent J 2015; 26(5), 547-51.

Paul R, Paul M, Paul G, et al. Comparison of accuracy of Root ZX and Propex II apex locator – an in-vitro study. Endodontology 2011; 23(2), 22-7.

Piasecki L, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF, et al. Accuracy of Root ZX II in locating foramen in teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study. J Endod 2011; 37(9), 1213-6.

Pishipati KVC. An in vitro comparison of Propex II apex locator to standard radiographic method. Iran Endod J 2013; 8(3), 114-7.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Brigante L, et al. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and Propex. Int Endod J 2006; 39(5), 408-14.

Renner D, Grazziotin-Soares R, Gavini G, et al. Influence of pulp condition on the accuracy of an electronic foramen locator in posterior teeth: an in vivo study. Braz Oral Res 2012; 26 (2), 106-11.

Soares RMV, Silva EJN, Herrera DR, et al. Evaluation of the Joypex 5 and Root ZX II: an in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J 2013; 46(10), 904-9.

Somma F, Castagnola R, Lajolo C, et al. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and Propex II. Int Endod J 2012; 45(6), 552-6.

Stöber EK, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercadé M, et al. An evaluation of Root ZX and iPex apex locators: an in vivo study. J Endod 2011; 37 (5), 608-10.

Stoll R, Urban-Klein B, Roggendorf MJ, et al. Effectiveness of four electronic apex locators to determine distance from the apical foramen. Int Endod J 2010; 43(9), 808-17.

Vasconcelos BC, Araújo RBR, Silva FCFA, et al. In vivo accuracy of two electronic foramen locators based on different operation systems. Braz Dent J 2014; 25(1), 12-6.

Vasconcelos BC, Bueno MM, Luna-Cruz SM, et al. Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci 2013; 21(2), 132-7.

Wrbas KT, Ziegler AA, Altenburger MJ, et al. In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2007; 40(2), 133-8.

Downloads

Publicado

2023-12-13

Edição

Seção

Articles