Hume's criticisms of induction and Peirce's semiotic epistemology: the value of pluralistic approaches for organizational knowledge
As críticas de Hume à indução e a epistemologia semiótica de Peirce: o valor das abordagens pluralistas para o conhecimento organizacional
Palavras-chave:
Hume, Peirce, Induction, Abduction, Knowledge ManagementResumo
This article proposes a comparative analysis between two fundamental philosophical theories that contribute to the construction of knowledge: David Hume's Critique of Induction and Charles Sanders Peirce's Cooperation of Truth. We will examine how these two approaches address the process of knowledge acquisition and reasoning. While Hume questions the validity of induction, Peirce develops a semiotic epistemology based on sign mediation. The analysis demonstrates that both highlight the role of inference in knowledge acquisition, though there are differences regarding the reliability of inductive reasoning. Furthermore, while Hume emphasizes the problem of justification, Peirce focuses on the cooperative pursuit of truth. By exploring these theories, we aim to discuss how they contribute to our understanding of the process through which we acquire and justify knowledge, also within an organizational context.
Downloads
Referências
Ayer, A.J. (1981). *Hume*. Lisboa: Dom Quixote.
Barra, Eduardo Salles O. (2010). "As Duas Respostas De Kant Ao Problema De Hume." *Princípios (Natal, Brazil), 9*(11-12), 145-78. Web.
Baskerville, R., & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. *Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4*(2), 83-105. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500090
Betarelli Junior, A. A., & Ferreira, S. de F. (2018). *Introdução à análise qualitativa comparativa e aos conjuntos Fuzzy (fsQCA)*. Brasília: Enap.
Brown, T. (2017). *Design thinking: uma metodologia poderosa para decretar o fim das velhas ideias. * [Rio de Janeiro]: Alta Books.
Buckle, S. (2007). Hume's Sceptical Materialism. *Philosophy, 82*(4), 553-578. doi:10.1017/S0031819107000150
Burgin, M. (2016). *Theory of knowledge: structures and processes*. New Jersey: World Scientific. (World Scientific series in information studies; Volume 5). ISBN 9789814522670.
Design Council. (2019, julho 9). *News & opinion. Design process: what double diamond*. Recuperado de https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond
Gil, A.C. (2002). *Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa* (4ª ed.). [São Paulo]: Atlas.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). *Criação de conhecimento na empresa: como as empresas japonesas geram a dinâmica da inovação*. Rio de Janeiro.
Santaella, L. (1983). *O que é semiótica*. Brasiliense, São Paulo, p.7-32-35.
Santaella, L. (2008). *Epistemologia Semiótica*. *Cognitio, São Paulo, 9*(1), 93-110.
Schneider, S., & Schmitt, C. J. (1998). *O uso do método comparativo nas Ciências Sociais*. *Cadernos de Sociologia, Porto Alegre, 9*, 49-87.
Shieber, J. (2019). *Theories of Knowledge: How to Think About What You Know*. Chantilly, VA, USA: The Teaching Company.
Viana, M., Viana, I., Adler, I. K., Lucena, & Russo, B. (2012). *Design thinking: inovação em negócios* [Rio de Janeiro]: MJV Press. E-book. Recuperado de https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/455690/Ofertas/E-books/Arquivos/livro-design-thinking-business-innovation.pdf
