An analysis of urgency in project management: the unified project urgency and economic speed analysis model
Uma análise da urgência em gerenciamento de projetos: o modelo unificado de análise de urgência e velocidade econômica de projetos
Palavras-chave:
Urgent Projects, Urgency, Project Management, Speed, Time ManagementResumo
This paper aims to address the gap in the literature concerning the role of urgency in project management. Specifically, it seeks to develop a Unified Theoretical Model that incorporates key variables such as urgency, speed, duration, and cost. To achieve this aim, a detailed analysis of essential articles was conducted from the Scopus database to understand the relationships and trade-offs among the variables. The research method involves both literature synthesis and Theoretical Model Formulation, culminating in the Unified Project Urgency and Economic Speed Analysis Model. This model serves as a mathematical and theoretical framework tailored for managerial decision-making in High-Intensity Time-Sensitive Projects. It highlights the complex interactions between urgency, duration, speed, and costs, thereby providing a structure to guide managerial actions. The study contributes to enriching the theoretical foundations in the field of urgent project management. Finally, it opens avenues for future research by extending theoretical insights that are relevant for both academic researchers and industry professionals.
Downloads
Referências
Aram, J.D., Javian, S., 1973. Correlates of success on customer-initiated R&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-20, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.1973.6448445
De Waard, E.J., Kalkman, J.P., 2022. Synthesizing extreme context studies in project management journals: introducing a time-based project management typology. IJMPB 15, 886–912. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-08-2021-0227
El-Anwar, O., Aziz, T.A., 2014. Integrated Urban-Construction Planning Framework for Slum Upgrading Projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000672
Hensmans, M., 2015. The Trojan horse mechanism and reciprocal sense-giving to urgent strategic change. Journal of Organizational Change Management 28, 1038–1075. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0084
McDonough, E.F., Pearson, A.W., 1993. An investigation of the impact of perceived urgency on project performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 4, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/1047-8310(93)90017-A
Mojtahedi, M., Oo, B.L., 2017. The impact of stakeholder attributes on performance of disaster recovery projects: The case of transport infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management 35, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.006
Nachbagauer, A., 2022. Synchronous and Diachronic Timing: Insights into Managing Projects from Disaster Management and Fast-Response Organizations. Project Management Journal 53, 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728221079414
Pan, J., Kuo, T., Bretholt, A., 2010. Developing a new key performance index for measuring service quality. Industrial Management & Data Systems 110, 823–840. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571011055072
Popa, V., Badea, L., Barna, M., 2011. Instruments and techniques used in the implementation of natural disaster risk response project. Polish Journal of Management Studies 4, 42–52.
Ren, X., Deng, X., Liang, L., 2018. Knowledge transfer between projects within project-based organizations: the project nature perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management 22, 1082–1103. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2017-0184
Sun, C., Xu, J., 2011. Estimation of time for Wenchuan earthquake reconstruction in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 137, 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000277
Tang, C.S., Zhang, K., Zhou, S.X., 2015. Incentive Contracts for Managing a Project with Uncertain Completion Time. Production and Operations Management 24, 1945–1954. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12387
Tishler, A., Dvir, D., Shenhar, A., Lipovetsky, S., 1996. Identifying critical success factors in defense development projects: A multivariate analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change 51, 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(95)00197-2
van den Ende, J., 2003. Modes of governance of new service development for mobile networks: A life cycle perspective. Research Policy 32, 1501–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00156-7
Wearne, S., 2006. Managing Unexpected Urgent Projects. Project Management Journal 37, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700510
Wearne, S., White-Hunt, K., 2014. Managing the Urgent and Unexpected: Twelve Project Cases and a Commentary. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Xia, B., Chan, A.P.C., 2012. Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 19, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09699981211192544
Yim, R.L., Castaneda, J.M., Doolen, T.L., Tumer, I.Y., Malak, R., 2015. Exploring the Relationship between Rework Projects and Risk Indicators. Project Management Journal 46, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21509
Zidane, Y.J.-T., Klakegg, O.J., Andersen, B., Hussein, B., 2018. Superfast! Managing the urgent: case study of telecommunications infrastructure project in Algeria. IJMPB 11, 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2016-0101