Water footprint of ‘Gigante’ cactus pear with deficit irrigation using wastewater and blue water plus cattle manure

Pegada hídrica do cultivo de palma forrageira ‘Gigante’ com irrigação com déficit controlado usando águas residuárias

Autores

  • José Alberto Alves de Souza Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano
  • Delfran Batista dos Santos Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano
  • Sérgio Luiz Rodrigues Donato Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano
  • Ignácio Aspiazu Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros

Palavras-chave:

Fertigation;, domestic sewage;, Opuntia fícus-indica;, water use efficiency.

Resumo

This study aims to evaluate the water footprint of cactus pear cultivated under different irrigation strategies. Treatments were: no fertilization and no irrigation (T1); no fertilization and deficit irrigation (DI) with wastewater (0.6 L plant-1 week-1) (T2); no fertilization and DI with wastewater (1.2 L plant-1 week-1, once a week) (T3); no fertilization and DI with wastewater (1.2 L plant-1week-1, divided in two weekly applications) (T4); with organic fertilization (60 Mg ha-1 of bovine manure) and DI with blue water (1.2 L plant-1 week-1) (T5); and with organic fertilization (60 Mg ha-1 of bovine manure) and no irrigation (T6). Treatments were arranged in a completely randomized blocks design, with five replicates. Productivity, nutrients applied and consumption of green and blue water were evaluated. The water footprint was lower in treatments irrigated with wastewater than in the other treatments. The DI, using blue water, makes it possible to increase crop productivity without increasing water footprint; in the absence of irrigation, organic fertilization does not reduce the water footprint; the DI, using wastewater, makes it possible to increase crop productivity while decreasing water footprint.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BERNARDO, S.; SOARES, A. A.; MANTOVANI, E. C.Manual de irrigação. 8.ed. – Viçosa: Ed. UFV, 2006.

BRASIL Resolução CONAMA 357 de 17 de março de 2005. Brasília, DF, 2005. Available in: www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res05/res35705.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2019.

CARVALHO, A. L.; MENEZES, R. S. C. Water footprints in farming systems in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. RevistaAgro@mbiente On-line, v. 8, n. 1, p. 142-148, Boa Vista, RR, 2014. DOI: 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v8i1.1315

CONSOLI, S.; INGLESE, G. P. H. D.; INGLESE, P. Determination of Evapotranspiration and Annual Biomass Productivity of a Cactus Pear [Opuntiaficus-indica L. (Mill.)] Orchard in a Semiarid Environment. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 139 (8): 680-690, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000589

COSTA, D. C.; MARTORANO, L. G.; MORAES, J. R. S. C.; LISBOA, L. S. S.; STOLF, R. Temporal dynamics of the water footprint of soybean hub grains in Western Pará, Amazon. Rev. Ambient. Água, vol. 13 n. 5, e2051 – Taubaté, 2018. DOI:10.4136/ambi-agua.2051

FERREIRA, D. F. Sisvar: a Guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciênc. agrotec. [online]. Vol.38, n.2, pp. 109-112, 2014. Available en: ISSN 1413-7054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001

HOEKSTRA, A. Y.; CHAPAGAIN, A. K.; ALDAYA, M. M.; MEKONNEN, M. M.The Water Footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard, Earthscan, London, UK, 2011.

MANTOVANI, E. C.EVALUATION: Sprinkler and Localized Irrigation Assessment Program. Viçosa, MG: UFV, 2001.

MEKONNEN, M. M.; HOEKSTRA, A. Y. A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, v. 14, n. 7, p. 1259–1276, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1259-2010

OWEIS, T.; ZHANG, H.; PALA, M. Water Use Efficiency of Rainfed and Irrigated Bread Wheat in a Mediterranean Environment. Agron. J. 92:231–238, 2000. DOI: 10.1007/s100870050027

QUEIROZ, M. D.; SILVA, T. G. F.; ZOLNIER, S.; SIQUEIRA E SILVA, S. M; SOUZA, C. A. A.; CARVALHO, H. F. S. Water-economic relations of ‘Gigante’ cactus pear cultivated in semi-arid environment. Irriga, Botucatu, Special edition, Irrigation, p. 141-154, 2016. https://doi.org/10.15809/irriga.2016v1n01p141-154

SILVA, V. P. R.; ALBUQUERQUE, M. F.; ARAÚJO, L. E.; CAMPOS, J. H. B. C.; GARCÊZ, S. L. A.; ALMEIDA, R. S. R. Measurements and modelling of water footprint of sugar cane cultivated in Paraíba State. R. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambiental, v.19, n.6, p.521–526, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v19n6p521-526

SILVA, V. P. R.; ALEIXO, D. O.; DANTAS NETO, J.; MARACAJÁ, K. F. B.; ARAÚJO, L. E. A measure of environmental sustainability: water footprint. R. Bras. Eng. Agríc. Ambiental (Online), v. 17, p. 100-105, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000100014

SILVA, J. A.; BONOMO, P.; DONATO, S. L. R.; PIRES, A. J. V.; ROSA, R. C. C.; DONATO, PAULO E. R.Composição mineral em cladódios de palma forrageira sob diferentes espaçamentos e adubações química. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, v.7, p.866-875, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v7isa2134

SMITH, M.; STEDUTO, P. Yield response to water: the original FAO water production function. In: STEDUTO, P.; HSIAO, T. C.; FERERES, E.; RAES, D. (Eds.), Crop yield response to water. Roma: FAO (Irrigation and Drainage Paper 66), 2012.

SOUZA, J. A. A.; BATISTA, R. O.; RAMOS, M. M.; SOARES, A. A. Microbiological contamination of soil by sewage. Acta Scientiarum. Technology, v. 33, n. 1, p.5-8, 2011. DOI: 10.4025/actascitechnol.v33i1.5350

SOUZA, J. A. A.; SANTOS, D. B.; CAMELO, T. C.; REIS, G. A.; COTRIM, C. E. Productivity and nutrient supply in ‘Gigante’ cactus pear with regulated deficit irrigation using wastewater. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 34(6): p.1-12, 2019. DOI:10.9734/jeai/v34i630191

THORNTHWAITE, C. W.; MATHER, J. R.The water balance. Centerton, NJ: Drexel Institute of Technology - Laboratory of Climatology. 104p. (Publications in Climatology, vol. VIII, n.1), 1955.

WILKINSON, S.; HARTUNG, W. Food production: reducing water consumption manipulating long-distance chemical signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 1885–1891, 2009. DOI:10.1093/jxb/erp121

Downloads

Publicado

2023-04-01

Edição

Seção

Articles