E-cigarettes and social media: prevalence of fact or “fake”?
Cigarro eletrônico e mídia social: prevalência de fato ou “fake”?
Palavras-chave:
Electronic cigarette, YouTube, Social mediaResumo
As a useful product for overcoming the addiction to smoking present in society, the electronic cigarette (EC) was presented as a less harmful alternative. Thus, it is assumed that social networks are a means of influence for the population, including YouTube as a means of propagandizing the use of ECs. To this end, 161 videos from the YouTube platform that refer to ECs were analyzed, of which 37 were in favor of their use, 28 neutral and 96 against; of the total views, 45% of the videos were in favor of using CE, 16% against, and 39% neutral; as for graduation, of the videos in favor of the use of ECs, only 2.7% have a degree in higher education, while of those who were neutral 39.28% have it, and of those against the use, 70.83% had higher education; As for the propagation rate, 44.18% were in favor of the use, 16.48% against and 39.34% with a neutral opinion. Thus, it is concluded that regardless of the veracity of the information transmitted, it is propagated by social networks, especially those with questionable veracity, which have a high rate of propagation; a fact that ratifies the public's tendency to consume content that confirms their ideas and supports their positions, which includes the theme of ECs.
Downloads
Referências
BERNARDO, W. Dispositivos Eletrônicos para Fumar. GGTAB: INOVA-HC-FMUSP, jan. 2021.
BERTONI, N. et al. Prevalence of electronic nicotine delivery systems and waterpipe use in Brazil: where are we going? Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, v. 24, p. e210007, dez. 2021.
BLOUNT, B. C. et al. Vitamin E Acetate in Bronchoalveolar-Lavage Fluid Associated with EVALI. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 382, n. 8, p. 697–705, dez. 2019.
BURGUESS, J.; GREEN, J. Youtube e a Revolução Digital. : como o maior fenômeno da cultura participativa transformou a mídia e a sociedade ed. [s.l.] ALEPH PUBLICAÇÕES E ASSESSORIA PEDAGÓGICA LTDA, 2022.
CARNEVALE, R. et al. Acute Impact of Tobacco vs Electronic Cigarette Smoking on Oxidative Stress and Vascular Function. Chest, v. 150, n. 3, p. 606–612, set. 2016.
CARVALHO, A. DE M. Cigarros Eletrônicos: O que Sabemos? Estudo sobre a Composição do Vapor e Danos à Saúde, o Papel na Redução de Danos e no Tratamento da Dependência de Nicotina. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, v. 64, n. 4, p. 587–589, dez. 2018.
CHUN, L. F. et al. Pulmonary toxicity of e-cigarettes. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, v. 313, n. 2, p. L193–L206, ago. 2017.
COVITEL et al. Inquérito Telefônico de Fatores de Risco para Doenças Crônicas não Transmissíveis em tempos de pandemia -Covitel Relatório Final. [s.l.] COVITEL, abr. 2022.
DAI, H.; HAO, J. Flavored Electronic Cigarette Use and Smoking Among Youth. PEDIATRICS, v. 138, n. 6, p. e20162513–e20162513, 7 nov. 2016.
DAYSE, P. et al. Youtube. Uma nova fonte de discursos. [s.l.] Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, 2010.
G, D. Most Visited Websites Globally – Mapping the Digital Giants [2024 Update]. Disponível em: <https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/most-visited-websites-in-the-world>. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2024.
GIROUD, C. et al. E-Cigarettes: A Review of New Trends in Cannabis Use. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 12, n. 8, p. 9988–10008, ago. 2015.
GOLDENSON, N. I. et al. Associations of Electronic Cigarette Nicotine Concentration With Subsequent Cigarette Smoking and Vaping Levels in Adolescents. JAMA Pediatrics, v. 171, n. 12, p. 1192, dez. 2017.
JÉRÉMIE POURCHEZ; FOREST, V. E-cigarettes: from nicotine to cannabinoids, the French situation. The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, v. 6, n. 5, p. e16–e16, maio 2018.
KRELING MEDEIROS1, A. et al. Differential diagnosis between lung injury associated with electronic cigarette use and COVID-19 pneumonia. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, v. 47, p. e20210058, jun. 2021.
LIU, A. H. et al. Public perceptions of synthetic cooling agents in electronic cigarettes on Twitter. PLOS ONE, v. 19, n. 3, p. e0292412–e0292412, mar. 2024.
MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE, A. N. DE V. S. RESOLUÇÃO No 46, DE 28 DE AGOSTO DE 2009.
MOHEIMANI, R. S. et al. Increased Cardiac Sympathetic Activity and Oxidative Stress in Habitual Electronic Cigarette Users. JAMA Cardiology, v. 2, n. 3, p. 278, mar. 2017.
MOREAN, M. E. et al. High School Students’ Use of Electronic Cigarettes to Vaporize Cannabis. PEDIATRICS, v. 136, n. 4, p. 611–616, set. 2015.
NICOLE BLAIR JOHNSON et al. CDC National Health Report: leading causes of morbidity and mortality and associated behavioral risk and protective factors--United States, 2005-2013. Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, v. 63, n. 4, p. 3–27, out. 2014.
OLMEDO, P. et al. Metal Concentrations in e-Cigarette Liquid and Aerosol Samples: The Contribution of Metallic Coils. Environmental Health Perspectives, v. 126, n. 2, p. 027010, fev. 2018.
PEREIRA, D. et al. The Health Effects and Anesthetic Management for Patients Using E-Cigarettes and Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Products: A Narrative Review. Revista Científica da Ordem dos Médicos, v. 35, n. 9, p. 663–668, set. 2022.
RUBINSTEIN, M. L. et al. Adolescent Exposure to Toxic Volatile Organic Chemicals From E-Cigarettes. Pediatrics, v. 141, n. 4, p. e20173557, mar. 2018.
SCHOLZ, J. R.; ABE, T. O. Cigarro Eletrônico e Doenças Cardiovasculares. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia, v. 65, n. 3, out. 2019.
SES-GO, S. DE E. DA S. et al. NARGUILÉ E CIGARRO ELETRÔNICO: MODISMO ENTRE ADOLESCENTES?, out. 2022.
WANG, Y. et al. Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of health-related Misinformation on Social Media. Social Science & Medicine, v. 240, n. 112552, nov. 2019.
