Multinational subsidiary's search for legitimacy: the isomorphism dilemma

Busca por legitimidade de subsidiária de empresa multinacional: o dilema do isomorfismo

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53660/CLM-3720-23P13

Palavras-chave:

Organizational Theory, Multinational Firm, Firm strategy, Business Strategy, Entry strategy, Strategic Management

Resumo

The development of companies is limited by institutions that create common paths for all companies, such as the need for mimetic isomorphism. However, when it comes to multinational companies (MNCs), this reality is more complex. These companies face pressure at the global level (from the headquarters and other subsidiaries). Our proposal aims to elucidate how MNCs use the principles of organizational fields in their strategy for entering new markets. We investigate Amazon's entry strategy into the Brazilian market, assessing its level of isomorphism, decoupling, and legitimation. A single case study was conducted on Amazon's entry into Brazil to analyze the consistency of Kostova, Roth & Dacin's (2008) propositions concerning the neoinstitutional theory of organizational fields. Our analysis identified five types of strategies for legitimation in the organizational field: legitimation, synergy, endorsement, innovation, and adaptation, all observed in practice in the case.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Renato Santos, Fundação Getulio Vargas

Graduado em Administração em 2011 pela UNIÃO EDUCACIONAL E TECNOLOGICA IMPACTA-UNI.IMPACTA LTDA. Em 2016 tornou-se mestre em Administração de Empresas, pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas - SP onde pesquisou os Drivers de Inovação de Modelos de Negócio. Em 2021, obteve o doutorado em Administração de Empresas pela Fundação Getúlio Vargas - SP onde pesquisou O Papel Moderador dos Aspectos Culturais na Relação Matriz X Subsidiária de Empresas Multinacionais. Atua na Faculdade Impacta desde 2015, sendo que, desde 2020 exerce a Coordenação do CST em Processos Gerenciais e do Bacharelado em Administração.

Referências

Ambos, B.; Birkinshaw, J. Headquarters’ Attention and Its Effect on Subsidiary Performance. Management International Review, v. 50, n. 4, p. 449–469, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0041-4. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Bartlett, C.; Ghoshal, S. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279037. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Birkinshaw, J.; Pedersen, T. Strategy and Management in MNE Subsidiaries. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Business. 2. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. p. 1–25. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/

003.0014. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Campinas, C. Brasil dos oligopólios: 10 empresas dominam 70% das vendas dos supermercados. Carta Campinas, 2015. Disponível em: https://cartacampinas.com.br/2015/01/brasil-dos-oligopolios-10-empresas-dominam-70-das-vendas-dos-supermercados/. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

DiMaggio, P. J.; Powell, W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, 1983.

Eisenhardt, K. M. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, v. 14, n. 4, p. 532–550, 1989. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Eisenhardt, K. M.; Graebner, M. E. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, v. 50, n. 1, p. 25-32, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Escobar, L. F.; Vredenburg, H. Multinational Oil Companies and the Adoption of Sustainable Development: A Resource-Based and Institutional Theory Interpretation of Adoption Heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 98, n. 1, p. 39–65, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0534-x. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Giddens, A. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

Greenwood, R.; Suddaby, R.; Hinings, C. R. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 1, p. 58-80, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Henisz, W. J.; Williamson, O. E. Comparative Economic Organization—Within and Between Countries. Business and Politics, v. 1, n. 3, p. 261–277, 1999. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/bap.1999.1.3.261. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Husted, B. W.; Allen, D. B. Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 37, n. 6, p. 838–849, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Kostova, T. Country institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1997(1), p. 180–184, 1997. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1997.4981338. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Kostova, T.; Roth, K. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 1, p. 215–233, 2002. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Kostova, T.; Zaheer, S. Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, v. 24, n. 1, p. 64–81, 1999. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580441. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Kostova, T.; Nell, P. C.; Hoenen, A. K. Understanding Agency Problems in Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations: A Contextualized Model. Journal of Management, v. 44, n. 7, p. 2611–2637, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316648383. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Kostova, T.; Roth, K.; Dacin, M. T. Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions. Academy of Management Review, v. 33, n. 4, p. 994–1006, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34422026. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Mariotto, F. L.; Zanni, P. P.; Moraes, G. H. S. M. De. What is the use of a single-case study in management research?. RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 54, n. 4, p. 358–369, 2014. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rae/article/view/28862. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Meyer, J. W.; Rowan, B. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 340–363, 1977. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

North, D. C. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 5, n. 1, p. 97–112, 1991. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

O’Brien, D.; Sharkey Scott, P.; Andersson, U.; Ambos, T.; Fu, N. The microfoundations of subsidiary initiatives: How subsidiary manager activities unlock entrepreneurship. Global Strategy Journal, v. 9, n. 1, p. 66–91, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1200. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Peng, X.; Cui, X.; Bai, Y.; Xu, Y. Institutional isomorphism pressure and multinational corporations’ environmental and social performance. Applied Economics Letters, v. 30, n. 17, p. 2424-2434, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851

.2022.2097628. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Popper, K. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959.

Rabbiosi, L.; Santangelo, G. D. Host country corruption and the organization of HQ–subsidiary relationships. Journal of International Business, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0169-1. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Rocha, B. Liberado! Amazon lança cartão de crédito com anuidade grátis, cashback e bônus de adesão. Melhores Cartões, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.melhorescartoes.com.br/cartao-credito-amazon-mastercard.html. Acesso em: 8 abr. 2024.

Rana, M. B.; Sørensen, O. J. Levels of legitimacy development in internationalization: Multinational enterprise and civil society interplay in institutional void. Global Strategy Journal, (November 2019), gsj.1371, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1371. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Thornton, P. H. Accounting for acquisition waves: Evidence from the U.S. publishing industry. In: Scott, W. R.; Christensen, S. (Eds.). The institutional construction of organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995.

van Hoorn, A.; Maseland, R. How institutions matter for international business: Institutional distance effects vs institutional profile effects. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 47, p. 374-381, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.2. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Williamson, O. E. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 36, n. 2, p. 269-296, 1991. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393356. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2024.

Winter, D. Top 100 global brands 2019: the full ranking. Financial Times, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.ft.com/content/3a3419f4-78b1-11e9-be7d-6d846537acab. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2024.

Yin, R. K. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e métodos. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman Editora, 2015.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-07-23

Como Citar

Vedana, D., & Santos, R. (2024). Multinational subsidiary’s search for legitimacy: the isomorphism dilemma: Busca por legitimidade de subsidiária de empresa multinacional: o dilema do isomorfismo. Concilium, 24(14), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.53660/CLM-3720-23P13

Edição

Seção

Articles