Effectiveness of orthopedic tenodesis surgery on flexion and supination strength: integrative review
Eficácia da cirurgia de tenodese ortopédica na força de flexão e supinação: revisão integrativa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53660/CLM-3484-24J09Palavras-chave:
Distal biceps tendon, tendon rupture, biceps, tenodesisResumo
Objective: Conduct an integrative review of the literature on the effectiveness of orthopedic tenodesis surgery on flexion and supination strength. Methods: The question was based on the acromion peak: How effective is orthopedic tenodesis surgery? The literature review was carried out considering only clinical trials. Result: Taking into account that the strength between the operated and non-operated elbow does not have a significant difference (p>0.005), for example, p=0.345 for flexion and p=0.114 for supination, demonstrating good post-operative results. In another study, we can also evaluate this improvement, where the non-operated side has p=0.210 and the postoperative side has p=0.169. After treatment, 98% of patients recover supination strength and 94% flexion strength, with 73% of these patients within the expected range for a normal population. Conclusion: From reading and analyzing the articles, it was observed that tenodesis surgery was a safe, effective and aesthetically satisfactory procedure, as there is no aesthetic or functional difference between the operated side and the postoperative side.
Downloads
Referências
DANIELLE CAMPAGNE. Rupturas no tendão do bíceps braquial. Disponível em: <https://www.msdmanuals.com/pt-br/profissional/les%C3%B5es-intoxica%C3%A7%C3%A3o/entorses-e-outras-les%C3%B5es-dos-tecidos-moles/rupturas-no-tend%C3%A3o-do-b%C3%ADceps-braquial#:~:text=Rupturas%20no%20tend%C3%A3o%20do%20b%C3%ADceps%20braquial%20causam%20dor%20s%C3%BAbita%20e,s%C3%A3o%20hematoma%2C%20edema%20e%20fraqueza.>. Acesso em: 22 out. 2023.
DONALD LEE. Seção I: ombro - Procedimento 20: Tenodese Bicipital Mini-Open. Em: Série de técnicas Operativas - Cirurgias do ombro e cotovelo. [s.l: s.n.]. .
INESTROSA, T. B. P. DE; MARTÍN, E. F.; ANDRÉS, B. T. Rotura de tendón bíceps braquial. FMC - Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria, v. 23, n. 2, p. e8, fev. 2016.
ISBELL, W. Tendon Ruptures. Em: Clinical Sports Medicine. [s.l.] Elsevier, 2006. p. 367–370.
KAPICIOĞLU, M. et al. Comparison of Single and Double Incision Repair Techniques in Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture. Bezmialem Science, v. 10, n. 4, p. 409–414, 19 ago. 2022.
MCCRUM, C. L. et al. Complications of biceps tenodesis based on location, fixation, and indication: a review of 1526 shoulders. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, v. 28, n. 3, p. 461–469, mar. 2019.
PATEL, K. V. et al. Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis. Clinics in Sports Medicine, v. 35, n. 1, p. 93–111, jan. 2016.
PUGACH, S.; PUGACH, I. Z. When is a conservative approach best for proximal biceps tendon rupture? The Journal of family practice, v. 62, n. 3, p. 134–6, mar. 2013.
TERRA, B. B. et al. Direct repair of chronic distal biceps tendon tears. Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), v. 51, n. 3, p. 303–312, maio 2016.
VÖLK, C. et al. Rupturen der distalen Bizepssehne. Der Unfallchirurg, v. 122, n. 10, p. 799–811, 18 out. 2019.
WERNER, B. C.; BROCKMEIER, S. F.; GWATHMEY, F. W. Trends in Long Head Biceps Tenodesis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, v. 43, n. 3, p. 570–578, 12 mar. 2015.
